Porta Potty Forum

Why is a monthly rental rate higher than four weekly rates?

Marcus B.asked 2 viewsCosts & Rental QuotesMonthly rentalWeekend rentalDelivery feeService visitService frequency

Got a quote for a standard portable toilet on a residential job site. The weekly rate was reasonable, but the monthly rate was more than four times that number. The site is accessible, level ground, and the truck can park right next to it. The invoice shows a monthly rental rate, a delivery fee, and weekly service visits. I expected the monthly price to be a discount for longer terms, not a premium. What drives that? Is it the service frequency, the operator's billing cycle, or something else in the contract?

1 answer

Sorted by votes
0
Ray M.Dallas, TX

The monthly rental rate is higher than four weekly rates because the rental company is billing for four full service visits plus the monthly rental fee, not offering a discount. You are paying for the unit and the service separately.

Your invoice breaks out a monthly rental rate for the physical toilet and a delivery fee to get it there. Then, it adds charges for each service visit, which is the weekly pumping and cleaning. A monthly contract typically includes four of these services. When you add the monthly rental fee to four weekly service fees, the total is more than if you just multiplied the weekly all-inclusive rate by four. The weekly rate you saw likely bundles a prorated rental and one service into a single price.

Operators do this because a unit on a long-term rental still consumes driver time, fuel, and deodorizer every week. The rental fee covers the unit's depreciation and administrative cost, while the service fee covers the labor and disposal. There is often no volume discount on the service portion because each visit has a fixed cost for the company. Check your contract; some companies offer a slight discount on the monthly rental portion for longer terms, but the per-service cost remains the same.

Your answer

Log in or create a free account to answer this question.